The incredible power of tutoring is shown clearly in Bloom’s 2-Sigma Problem.
Benjamin Bloom, also famous for Bloom’s Taxonomy, randomly selected three cohorts of students to be taught in three very different ways: conventional classroom, mastery classroom (same as conventional, but with reinforcement) and direct instruction (tutoring).
The results were remarkable:
Conventional I Mastery I Tutoring
Top Grades 20% I 70% I 90%
Time on Task 65% I 75% I 90+%
Attitudes and interest Least Positive ———— Most Positive
According to Bloom himself, this is the most striking result:
“The tutoring process demonstrates that most of the students do have the potential to reach this high level of learning.”
Then Bloom goes on to say that:
“The tutoring process demonstrates that most of the students do have the potential to reach this high level of learning.”
I find this totally mind-blowing.
If it’s possible with tutoring for students to achieve so well, why isn’t the system built around tutoring?!
Bloom takes a different turn in his paper then, saying:
“One-to-one tutoring is too costly for most societies to bear on a large scale.”
And so I ask, in my characteristically naive and idealistic fashion:
Once you know how powerful tutoring is, and how much untapped potential sits in our classrooms, can we afford not to tutor?